03.28.08

Review: “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly”

Posted in Film Reviews tagged , at 6:47 pm by Nick Plowman

The Diving Bell and The Butterfly

“Le Scaphandre et le Papillon”

From the very first frame, you know that you are not about to witness a conventional heroic tale nor shall you be embarking on a simple inspirational journey. You feel claustrophobic and unable to move. Slowly but surely everything comes into focus and you realise where you are. You are in a hospital room and hospital staff surround you. Then you realize that you are not even you, you are seeing through the eyes of Jean-Dominique Bauby (Mathieu Almaric), the controversial editor of the French Elle magazine. You are trapped in his body, just as he is. He has been in a stroke-induced coma for three weeks and finds himself completely paralyzed, with the exception of his left eyelid. A neurologist tells him that he has a rare condition called “locked-in syndrome.” His body holds him back physically but his imagination and mind are intact. His cognitive function is retained, and that is after all more important than ones body, it allows ones soul to speak volumes. With his functioning eyelid, he managed to dictate his life-affirming autobiography titled “Le Scaphandre et le Papillon” which translates to “The Diving Bell and The Butterfly” in English, on which this heroic film by artist-turned-director Julian Schnabel is based.

While in his tragic state, Bauby’s speech therapist Henriette (Marie-Josée Croze) noticed that he could blink his fore mentioned left eyelid. She constructed a special alphabet for him in such a way that the letters were arranged according to their frequency of use. She would read these letters aloud and when she reached the letter Bauby wished to use, he would blink. In a way, she assisted in freeing him, allowing him to communicate with others and give more insight into his thoughts and feelings when his body would not allow him to. Dictating his autobiography took an incredible amount of patience and will power, not just on his part. Those around him were completely selfless and patient when even Bauby himself didn’t expect them to be. 

The way the autobiography had been written, from Bauby’s viewpoint, proved to be problematic when the decision was made to adapt the book to film. The only way the film would be able to retain any of the impact the book had would be to get the audience to feel exactly how Bauby felt, hence the captivating opening scenes. Schnabel knew this from the start and he ensured that the audience would be able to see and hear exactly what Bauby did, both in reality and in his imagination, and he was aided by South African-born screenwriter Ronald Harwood’s fascinating screenplay.

As everything comes into focus and we move out of Bauby’s body, we gain more insight about the man himself, not just his physical incapacity. He was still alive. He had things to say, feelings, memories and above all, a will to survive. Of course, in his initial and inevitable moment of panic he wanted to die. When everything came into focus for him as well as us he knew that his time on Earth was not over and he still had something to share. Writing his book gave him a reason to live and a reason to reconnect what he had lost when he was physically healthy – but detached from reality because of his disregard for life itself. We get hints of his past through flashbacks that are tied brilliantly into the film, outstanding editing indeed. We hear about him abandoning his wife and children when he runs away with his mistress. We see him meeting with his sickly father, Papinou (Max Von Sydow), who tells him that his leaving his wife Celine (Emmanuelle Seigner) was an idiotic thing to do. We see him in a time when he didn’t care much for life, as long as the ride was fun. Then the we see his ride come to an end when he is driving in the countryside and suddenly has a stroke. But it is clear that these are just fragments of what was. Not the end of a life, but the beginning of something more profound.

The performances in this film are genuine and not at all sentimental or patronizing. Almaric creates a man who we know to be a victim of a victor-less crime but he does not ever allow you to actually think him to be a victim. He portrays a man that was forced to change, as well as the man before this change. As he shows us who Bauby was before the stroke, you don’t feel disdain for this adulterous and cynical man, but you feel inspired by the how far he managed to come. He took into account the great amount of restraint and internal emotions he would have to convey, and gives on of the most moving and touching performances in a very long time. The rest of the cast are irreplaceable and equally great. Max von Sydow, as Bauby’s father, gives a truly heartbreaking turn as a man who is aging and a man who has lived, but now has to watch as his young son becomes a prisoner in his own body. His character is not able to see his son’s greatness the way the audience can, he only thinks about the insurmountable pain and suffering that he assumes his son is going through. We are given the impression that Bauby’s father is in greater pain than Bauby feels himself, and this only makes you feel even more sorry for Papinou. The women in Bauby’s life that he took for granted before his stroke are the ones that are at his side throughout his ordeal, and special mention must be made of the gorgeous Emmanuelle Seigner and Marie-Josée Croze’s performances.

Without Schnabel’s artistic direction and brutal honesty, the film could have become one message after another flashing before our eyes, but he stays true to the spirit of Bauby. There is not a hint of the film preaching at all, and the harrowing subject matter is matched with the dark humour Bauby expressed in his book. Schnanel’s unique vision is shared by cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, and a surreal and dreamlike palette is constructed, that can only be described as a true work of art. A masterpiece even.

Ten days after Bauby’s autobiography was published to great acclaim, he died of pneumonia. The impressionistic film immortalizes Jean-Do’s life, not just as a man suffering from a debilitating illness, not as a man who lost is ability to move and be free, but as a man who defied all odds and stopped wasting his life. He will always be remembered as a man who was able to break free from the diving bell that could very well have consumed his unquestionable humanity and intense human spirit and became, in almost every sense of the word, a butterfly.

Fatac Rating: *****

The Diving Bell and The Butterfly. Director: Julian Schnabel. Adapted from Jean-Dominique Bauby’s autobiography “Le Scaphandre et le Papillon” by Ronald Harwood. Cinematography by Janusz Kaminksi. Starring: Mathieu Amalric, Emmanuelle Seigner, Marie-Josee Croze, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Max Von Sydow. Running Time: 112 minutes. Age Restriction: PG 13. USA 2007. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars. [A+]

18 Comments »

  1. Great review Nick…I agree wholeheartedly. I wish the Academy had gotten over their foreign language bias and nominated this wholly unique masterpiece.

  2. Nick Plowman said,

    Thanks Matty! I loved it, I knew I would, but it was so, effing brilliant.
    During the Oscar season, I had not seen it, and I didn’t care that it didn’t get that much love, but now I do. If Michael Clayton or Atonement could get BP noms, Diving Bell deserved one more. *happy sigh* my love of film grows each day…

  3. Glad you liked it Nick. One of the great things about it for me was how they didn’t make Bauby out to be a saint. They showed the man flaws and all and it made his struggle all the more powerful.

    Good review.

  4. Nick Plowman said,

    Yes! It made all the difference, if Bauby was a saint the whole story would just be plain sad and depressing, for me anyway.

  5. jamesd said,

    I was going to watch this, but now I really have to. Thanks for the great review!

  6. Nick Plowman said,

    You must see it james, must! One of last year’s very best indeed.

  7. Best movie of 2007.

    I was captivated… I don’t think I moved for two hours.

  8. matt said,

    I haven’t heard anything about this film but I’m determined to get a hold of it now after reading your great review. I definitely got a strong sense of how truly moving this film is.

    P.S. I found you through LAMB. And I’ll be back!

  9. Nick Plowman said,

    Hey Nayana, same here, completely captivated. I would watch it everyday if I could.

    Matt, you have to see it, you just have to, it will change your life.

    Isn’t LAMB such a great place? Please, you are welcome here anytime ;)

  10. Daniel said,

    “The only way the film would be able to retain any of the impact the book had would be to get the audience to feel exactly how Bauby felt”

    Having not read the book, I didn’t even think about that. Very interesting insight. DBB was definitely near the top of my list last year, but I still haven’t gone to the trouble of finding out why it wasn’t brought up in the Best Foreign Film discussion. Was Persepolis France’s submission?

    I also thought Almaric was tremendous and completely overlooked last year.

  11. Matthew Lucas said,

    Daniel,

    DBB was not eligible for best foreign language film because it was made by an American director, and isn’t technically a foreign film. “Persepolis” was indeed France’s submission, but since this wasn’t technically a French film they couldn’t have submitted it.

    It wasn’t eligible for the same reasons as “Letters from Iwo Jima,” “Apocolypto,” and “The Kite Runner.”

  12. Nick Plowman said,

    Dan, having read the book I can truly say that there was no way that the impact of the book would be perfectly translated on screen, but I think in DBB it was done as best as anyone could have hoped.

    As Matt said {which I did not know] Persepolis was France’s submission. I think it is a travesty that this was not nominated for Best Picture, but that is just my opinion.

    Almaric as well, you are right, overlooked to say the least.

  13. Alison Flynn said,

    Great review, Nick!

    As you know, this was my #1 fave of 2007. I was very disappointed that it got noms in 4 categories that make excellent filmmaking – and this was magnificent filmmaking – yet didn’t get a BP nomination. Likewise, both Amalric and von Sydow were criminally overlooked.

    I haven’t read the book, but am about to start it.

    I’m glad that this film was as enjoyable and moving for you as it was for me. You really expressed much of what is so magnificent about it in your review.

  14. Nick Plowman said,

    Thanks, I dedicate it to…you!

    I remember you championing it all through the season and I wanted to see it more every time you spoke of it!

    You are going to LOVE the book, I know it.

    I am glad my review got your approval, it was the only opinion I cared about!

  15. Daniel said,

    Thanks for clarifying, Matthew. Of course Schnabel is American! Guess I got confused what with the funny talkin’ and all…

  16. Nick Plowman said,

    I was confused to at first too, I never even knew he was American!

  17. Mark P. Sims said,

    I loved “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly”, but the movie I’d rather see is “My Stroke of Insight”, which is the amazing bestselling book by Dr Jill Bolte Taylor. It is an incredible story and there’s a happy ending. She was a 37 year old Harvard brain scientist who had a stroke in the left half of her brain. The story is about how she fully recovered, what she learned and experienced, and it teaches a lot about how to live a better life. Her TEDTalk at TED dot com is fantastic too. It’s been spread online millions of times and you’ll see why!

  18. Nick Plowman said,

    Coolio, I will look out for it, sounds interesting indeed, and I did adore “Diving Bell,” so yeah.

    Thanks for stopping by…


Leave a Comment