05.05.08

Review: 12:08 East of Bucharest (2007)

Posted in Film Reviews tagged , , , , at 1:50 pm by Nick Plowman

1208 East of Bucharest

A fost sau n-a fost?

The “Romanian New Wave” is something I have not been all that familiar with, which is a shame. Having only seen “The Death of Mr. Lazarescu” by Cristi Puiu before “12:08 East of Bucharest,” I knew it was an exciting, under appreciated cinematic movement. Having now seen the hilariously quirky “Bucharest” twice - I cannot wait to see what the observant Romanians come up with next, and am anticipating the release of “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” (releasing on the 11th of July) more than ever.

Set on the anniversary of the revolution that saw the fall of Communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, who fled Bucharest on the 22nd of December 1989 at exactly 12:08pm, “Bucharest” is a bleak but hopeful tale of truth and reconciliation in terms of figuring out the definition of a “revolution” – laced with biting wit and hilarity beneath the political echoes and deadpan small-town life.

We first meet Tiberiu Manescu (Ion Sapdaru), an alcoholic history teacher, and Old-Man Piscoci (Mircea Andreescu) who lives a lonely existence highlighted with the prospect of playing Santa Clause come Christmas time. Christmas seems to be overly glum this particular year, due to the strange weather conditions and lack of money. When they are invited to take part in a broadcasted remembrance of the revolution and to discuss their part in overthrowing communism, the seemingly aimless quality of the picture wears off and the dry humour does not stop flowing.

Virgil Jderescu (Teodor Corban), a local television show host, decides to dedicate a show to figuring out whether a revolution took place in the town square of Vaslui, or not. Was there anyone there before the media flooded with news of a revolt? Did people only start streaming in after the news broke? He makes it his mission to find out the truth and grills his guests whose claims are directly contradictory to those given by the show’s on-air callers.

Manescu claims to have been in the square before the revolt and therefore claiming to have started it, but everyone who calls in claims he is a drunk and a liar. Virgil’s word-for-word recitations of quotes he picked up from the “Dictionary of Mythology” start taking its toll and his good intentions crumble under the weight of the fact that the answer to his question seems to be non-existent. Instead of paying too much attention to their public ridicule, Manescu and Piscoci make the most of the time by playing with pieces of paper in between their mumbled accusations and curses. In more than one humorous instance, a hand belonging to a production assistant makes its way into the frame, confiscating the paper from the child-like guests.

The simple joke in the film is that no one honestly remembers what happened that day, who was there or who was not, when it happened and how it happened. Memory of the day has since faded, and nostalgia is all that remains. History is a stubborn topic, where no two people share the exact same beliefs. If nothing else, “Bucharest” offers a simple solution – those differences do not matter. In actual fact, in order for a revolution to take place, these characters would need to adapt to drastic change on a personal level as well as in a communal sense - something they are all clearly incapable of doing. But has time simply changed them or have they always been this way? The memories are too foggy for anyone to remember clearly. One thing is certain, it seems as though it does not take a hero to start a revolt - or join one - but also the humble and meek. The journey taken in trying to figure the answer out is thoroughly amusing and perceptive and that it is consolation for the initial cynicism the film gives off.

Told with conviction and effortless comedic skill, the actors never give the impression that they are performing – it is not often that such pessimism can come across as accessible, something the Romanians seem naturally capable of. Director Corneliu Porumboiu weaves these ideas of the validity of time and human nature into a resonant story, one where, at the end of the day, the lights always shine – be it one by one or all together.

Fatac Rating: ***½

12:08 East of Bucharest. Written and Directed by Corneliu Porumboiu. Cinematography by George Dascalescu & Marius Panduru. Music by Rotaria. Starring: Mircea Andreescu, Teodor Corban, Ion Sapdaru. Running Time: 89 minutes. Age Restriction: TBC. Language: Romanian wih English subtitles. Rating out of five stars.

Not released in South Africa.
Viewed on the small-screen.

Bookmark and Share

6 Comments »

  1. Matthew Lucas said,

    May 5, 2008 at 6:20 pm

    I loved this film. I think its deadpan sense of humor is hilarious…and I think it was amazing how much of it was done with just one static shot of the 3 men during the broadcast. The running gag with the camera operator is priceless too.

    One of the neat things about the Romanian New Wave is how many of the same actors pop up in all of the films. Teo Corban and Ion Sapdaru both appear in “4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days,” and “California Dreamin’ (Endless).”

  2. Nick Plowman said,

    May 5, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    You are the Romanian New Wave master, I cannot wait to see “4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days,” and “California Dreamin’ (Endless)” which I know you enjoyed, I am very much interested in the movement, if ever you discover new developments etc be sure to let me know!

  3. Alison Flynn said,

    May 8, 2008 at 4:19 am

    Great review, Nick. You’re writing gets better and better. I just watched this movie tonight for the first time and loved it. The humor is just wonderful. And as Matthew points out, the running gag with the camera operator is priceless. As is what the two guests do to the paper. :)

    I still think 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days is a better movie overall, but I thoroughly enjoyed this one.

  4. Nick Plowman said,

    May 8, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    Thanks Alison, coming from you, that means a lot :)

    I loved it too, and I never expected it to be as funny as it was!

    Honestly, having to wait two more months for “4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days” is killing me - but I know I will appreciate it more when I see it. I really hope I like it as much as everyone else does, because if it is better than “Bucharest,” it must be something really special.

  5. Alison Flynn said,

    May 8, 2008 at 5:21 pm

    “4 Weeks” is much heavier than “Bucharest” and there are a couple of cringe-worthy scenes, I must warn you. Nothing terrible and you may have heard that already, but just wanted to put it out there for you.

    I have to say, I wasn’t expecting that comical side of “Bucharest” either. It starts off quite dreary, which really sums up the way Romania felt and looked at that time. Then little by little the quirks of the characters come out. And then the television show part is a riot.

  6. Nick Plowman said,

    May 8, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    I actually have not heard much about “4 Months” other than that it is really good - but thanks for the heads up :)

    I think I actually want to buy “Bucharest” on DVD - it has really stayed with me, and I cannot get over those characters. When it started - I was like “Come on, get moving…” but towards the end I was like “Please don’t end, please don’t end!” Then it ended and I realised that I love Romanian filmmaking, and I cannot believe I did not see the film sooner - it has been on DVD for a few months now, but I always passed it in favour of others. Glad I picked right last weekend.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.