05.07.08
Review: “Taxi to the Dark Side”

Dilawar, a rural Afghan peanut farmer turned taxi driver, took his brand new taxi to pick up his first fare – but never made it to his second. As a cover up of their own terrorist activities, certain Afghan rebel forces were capturing innocent civilians and turning them in to American authorities. Dilawar was captured and falsely imprisoned at the, now notorious, Bagram Air Base in 2002, and his three male passengers were sent to Guantanamo Bay – a place that is meant to keep suspected terrorists in isolation – but instead, as a once-Guanatanamo detainee points out, it is more likely to simply create even more terrorists.
The four men were never officially charged with anything – in other words, they were completely innocent – but Dilawar nonetheless died because of the inhumane interrogation acts used by United States soldiers. Alex Gibney (“Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”) whips out his morality microscope in his Oscar winning expose “Taxi to the Dark Side,” armed with a focused agenda, in attempt to deconstruct the happenings of that day, as well as the “anti-terrorism” measures deemed necessary by the United States government and wilfully carried out by the ignorant and soft-spoken soldiers.
The conduct of the American government has been under such heavy scrutiny over the past year, in reference to the staggering amount of politically charged films and documentaries, but “Taxi to the Dark Side” remains one of the compelling and genuinely chilling – just as compelling as “No End in Sight.” Both films make more effective examinations than any of the dramatic enactments and melodramas of last year – and are so shocking that no one, not even those with their heads buried in the sand, can deny the legitimacy of the questions and answers conveyed. It is by no means an easy documentary to watch, but is essential and guarantees an impact in some way or another on the viewer.
Told by means of interviews and re-enactments with surviving detainees, journalists, politicians and the soldiers who were present during the interrogation of Dilawar, the documentary focuses not only on the one horrific occurrence, but branches into a full-on investigation into the American government rewriting the policy on torture as laid out in the Geneva Conventions to suit their own political and military agenda.
Several eyewitnesses, in this case the soldiers at the detention centre, among the interviewees go into elaborate detail into the ways and means used to break Dilawar down and do so in such a candid matter, it is difficult to choose whether to hate the individuals or actually feel sorry for them – they come across as naïve and, for the most part, it seems as though it is more a lack of clarity that results in such violence than actual hatred of suspected “terrorists.” Dilawar’s death was ruled an accident – even though his death certificate, written in English, sent to his non-English speaking relatives indicated homicide.
A New York Times investigation later opened up the scandal to some degree and certain officers and soldiers were punished – but no one bothered to figure out exactly who is responsible for the immorality even though it is clear that the orders came from a higher source. Perhaps the cover up is too thick to penetrate fully?
The film may very well serve as an indictment of present day ethics, as well as a warning to future generations who will no doubt have to grow up in a world where governments, especially those who think they have power of everyone and everything else, cannot even follow their own rules. Unless something is done about this – and no offence to Alex Gibney or his film intended – which may mean more than making excellent, eye-opening documentaries, the world as we know it could truly become a far darker place. “Taxi to the Dark Side” is, however, as good a place to start as any.
Fatac Rating: ****
Taxi to the Dark Side. Written and Directed by Alex Gibney. Music by Ivor Guest and Robert Logan. Running Time: 100 minutes. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars. [A]
Daniel said,
May 7, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Glad that this made it to you, Nick (on TV?). I personally found it just a touch inferior to No End in Sight, partly because I felt it was a little scattered (literally speaking with the three sites, but figuratively speaking with Gibney’s too-broad investigation of the effectiveness of torture/interrogation techniques), and partly because I didn’t feel like I took much new information away from it. But I suppose I might read the news a little more than the average person, and this is great for educational purposes.
Lastly, as I’ve mentioned everywhere else, I was really uncomfortable with his use of the photos and video, particularly that of the masturbating detainees. I know he wasn’t letting us look away from the crimes, and I know that the film isn’t playing at a Baghdad multiplex anytime soon, but the fact remains that the continued, extended use of these graphic images is still humiliating to these men – especially if they’re innocent. Just my opinion.
Matthew Lucas said,
May 8, 2008 at 6:11 am
I agree Daniel, I think “No End in Sight” is a better film, and ultimately offers more insight.
I think “Taxi’s” victory has more to do with a vote split between “No End” and “Sicko” than overwhelming love for “Taxi,” which is still a very good film.
I like the review Nick. You sure you wanna come live in America? :-P
Nick Plowman said,
May 8, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Danny – it premiered in SA back in September last year, but I did not really write reviews then. I showed on TV on “Freedom Day” in SA – and that is no doubt where most people saw it. I saw it for the second time on TV.
Right – I too think “No End in Sight” is a better, more astutely focused film – but I think it was just as “compelling” as “Taxi to the Dark Side.” The nudity and sexual stuff, for me, was also a little off-putting but I guess Gibney really wanted to get his point across – I did not like it much at all. What was the point of humiliating them in the first place? Personally, I don’t think the nudity and *stuff* really humiliated them, more like it made me more angry at those responsible, made me feel sorry for the detainees more than anything else.
I do not think it was THAT informational, as you say Dan, but to the ordinary person, i.e. those who are not really focused on News, I guess it could be eye opening. If nothing else, these kind of docs give a voice to the frustrations we all feel but have no way of getting them out there.
Compelling – “having a powerful and irresistible effect.”
I mean – sure “No End in Sight” deserved to win, but as you say Matt – a split most likely occurred.
Do I still want to come to America? As long as there is Hollywood, another law unto itself, I am there. I most probably will never vote though. I don’t know!